web analytics
Breaking News         Burbank KC     09/26/2015     Best In Show Judge: Mr. Edd E. Bivin     Best In Show: CH Vjk-Myst Garbonit'a California Journey     Warrenton KC (2)     09/26/2015     Best In Show Judge: Dr Ronald Spritzer     Best In Show: GCH Hill Country's Tag I'M It     Bonanza KC of Carson City     09/26/2015     Best In Show Judge: Dr. Karen M Ericson     Best In Show: GCH Skyline's Unit Of Measure     Grand Valley KC (3)     09/26/2015     Best In Show Judge: Mrs. Gloria L. Geringer     Best In Show: GCH Sabe's Simply Invincible     Greater Murfreesboro KC     09/26/2015     Best In Show Judge: Pat Trotter     Best In Show: CH Ashdown's Time To Thrill     AKC Booth at the Big E Promotes Purebred Dog to 1.3 Million Attendees Breeder Bulletin – Jennifer Kofron, Sun Devil Curlies Top Dog 2015 – Three Quarter Leaders The Elkhound As the Wheels Turn – In a World Gone Mad…

We'll email you the stories that fanciers want to read from all around the web daily

We don't share your email address

DSSA Issues Poll on Proposed AKC Groups Realignment

AKC delegates will vote on March 13 whether to recommend to the board of directors that the current seven Groups be further split into 11.

The realignment of breeds would make major changes to the Hound, Sporting and Working Groups. Hounds would be divided into Sight Hounds and Scent Hounds, the Sporting breeds would move into two separate Pointer and Setter, and Retriever and Spaniel Groups, and the Working Group would become three Groups: Working-Utility, Working-Molosser and Working-Spitz. In addition, several breeds in Non-Sporting and Herding would move to other Groups.

In response, the Dog Show Superintendents Association put out a poll last week to its members to “better understand the thinking of the Fancy and possibly how best to implement the new Variety Groups.”

A DSSA analysis of the issue states that the realignment “should have little impact on most shows at the Group level. Few shows have most or all breeds in the current seven Groups represented at that level. For those occasions where the Group Ring available is too small for the number of breeds, the Judge can divide the dogs as they do now with a large class in a breed.”

However, the DSSA further points out, “The addition of four Groups will add time to the length of a normal all-breed show day at a time when AKC is urging judging schedules be compressed and have no delays.” The organization estimates it will extend the average show by one to two hours, while offering the option of judging Groups concurrently or throughout the day as breed judging within a Group concludes. The DSSA notes that this would pose “other challenges,” but doesn’t elaborate.

The poll poses two essential questions: “Are you in favor of this proposal?” and “Why or why not?” It also asks whether the respondent is in favor of concurrent or as-possible Group judging.

Changes in the Groups were first proposed by a special realignment committee created in October 2007 to “align breeds that are similar in conformation, structure or function; improve judges’ education by building on similarities; accommodate new breeds within the Groups; increase entries/enhance exhibitor experience by providing additional opportunities for Group placement; and improve spectator understanding of dog shows,” according to the AKC.

A 2009 proposal to create 10 Groups, leaving the Working Group intact, was referred by delegates in March 2010 back to a re-formed committee for further work.

In a 2011 memo to the AKC Board and Delegates, the committee said, “The time has come.”

Should the board approve the breed reassignments, the changes would take effect sometime in 2015.

For further information, visit the AKC website FAQ page.

Revised 3/20/12 to correct the date of the delegate’s vote on this issue.

Written by

  • Juniordogger March 4, 2012 at 10:33 AM

    Interesting proposition.

    I’ve taken the poll and I’ve voted for the reallignment. But there have been so many changes this year, especially regarding Westminister, can the community handle such a big, rocking change?

    I see a lot of complaining in the future if we do it this year.

    But I really do like the idea of all the miscellanious breeds being moved immediately into a group.

    there are major pros and cons and I can’t wait to hear what the board decides!

  • Joyce April 1, 2012 at 11:36 PM

    I’m against any realignment. The powers that be at the AKC have become lax in their own mission statement regarding purebred dogs. At any rate, if any breeds are to be moved into other groups or any breeds currently in the miscellaneous group are put into a group, it should only be with the full consent of the breed’s parent club. The AKC BOD and committees shouldn’t trump the parent club’s wishes on their breeds. Lumping breeds that look similar is ridiculous in my opinion. If that is the criteria used, the Pomeranian will be in the same groups as the Akita and the Chow Chow? I think not! Will the Italian Greyhound be pushed from the toy group to the sighthound group because it resembles a greyhound or whippet? I could stand on this soapbox for days but suffice it to say… AKC can put the breeds in a hundred groups but put the breeds where the parent club wants them. It’s only right!

  • Post a comment