web analytics
Breaking News         James River KC     07/29/2015     Best In Show Judge: Barbara Dempsey Alderman     Best In Show: GCH Gala Brighton Lakridge Relfections Of Me     Burlington Wisconsin KC (2)     07/28/2015     Best In Show Judge: Mr. Carl Gene Liepmann     Best In Show: GCH JOVAL Sweet Time     Bald Eagle KC of Williamsport, PA. (2)     07/27/2015     Best In Show Judge: Marjorie Martorella     Best In Show: GCH Mahogany's Gallant Spirit V Charley     Burlington Wisconsin KC     07/27/2015     Best In Show Judge: Mrs. Polly Smith     Best In Show: GCH Telltale American Ride     Bald Eagle KC of Williamsport, PA.     07/26/2015     Best In Show Judge: Judy Harrington     Best In Show: CH CharterOak BluStar     Dog Trip to Southern France, September, 2015 The End of a 70 Year Love Affair? Fox Sports and Westminster KC to Bring Annual Dog Show to Fox Sports 1 and Nat Geo City of Whittier, CA to Consider Mandatory/Spay Neuter Policy – August 11 As the Wheels Turn – Best of the Breed

We'll email you the stories that fanciers want to read from all around the web daily

We don't share your email address

Grading Dogs Motivating or a Spoiler

I DON’T often take issue with Sheila Atter’s brilliant columns but I can’t bring myself to agree with her concluding remarks in her article from two weeks ago.

I’ve often wondered whether adopting a grading system might help make our shows more interesting, especially in the breeds where entries are regularly huge and you can go to show after show with a decent dog but because of the strength of competition and the sheer numbers in the classes, have very little to show for your efforts.

At least if you regularly received an ‘excellent’ grade or the equivalent, you would know you were showing a quality specimen, even if you seldom manage to feature in the major places, and this may give you an incentive to continue.

But there is a down side to grading, which, even though I’m keen on the idea in principle, does worry me in practical terms.

In several breeds I’m interested in, there are exhibitors who come to the shows principally to have a good day out among friends and who enjoy participating with their dog. The dogs may not be the greatest specimens in the world, nor may the exhibitors have developed the presentation and handling skills to match their more serious competitors. Yet they still enjoy their days out, even if more often than not they are placed at the end of the line, and contribute to the viability of the shows.

Yet would they be so keen if they continually received lower grades? Yes, in some cases, as Sheila suggests, this might spur them on to obtain a better dog and to become more competitive in the way they produce the dog for the ring. But others, I’m afraid, might simply get depressed and drop out, which is surely not in the long term interests of the show scene.

In our quest for the highest standards, it is sometimes easy to forget that dog showing is basically all about people! People who need to be made to feel welcome in the sport. Without them, the sport really will die.

Sheila ends by saying: “Surely 20 top class examples of a breed gives a better level of competition than an entry of 200, where 190 are not really in contention for top honours.”

Perhaps in some ways she is right, but quite how you can keep dog showing going with a tenth of the current entry I don’t know. And if you effectively exclude the owners of the sub-standard 190, might you be actively discouraging the next generation of breeder/exhibitors of the top class dogs of the future? Sorry Sheila, but I don’t think that this sort of super-elitism is the way forward.

– See more at: http://www.dogworld.co.uk/product.php/116934#sthash.pHZ2IalW.dpuf

Written by

Dog World’s Simon Parson is one of the most well respected canine journalist in the UK. Simon his been with DW since 1979 and edited the newspaper for 17 years.
  • ljmilder
    Linda Milder June 26, 2014 at 3:47 AM

    I think a grading system would promote breeding better dogs which is the whole purpose of the sport. People would have a better measuring stick against which to judge their breeding stock. For those who just want a day out, they can still show, they will have to accept the results but there are always performance events.

  • Pat Burgee June 26, 2014 at 5:15 PM

    I take Simon’s point but can’t agree.It sounds too much like preferring to remain in ignorance.People can continue to remain active in dogs even if their current specimen isn’t well rated.They should be made aware of it’s deficiencies BEFORE they,in their ignorance,decide to breed it.There is such a lack of basic understanding of dog conformation and type these days that every opportunity to educate most be explored.And besides,we are adults here and should be able to face the truth about our dogs.

  • Post a comment