web analytics
Login
Subscribe
Breaking News         Rhode Island KC (2)     04/13/2014     Best In Show Judge: Mrs. Gale Young     Best In Show: GCH Sonnus Filho (Sanchez)     Mason And Dixon KC     04/13/2014     Best In Show Judge: Mr. James Reynolds     Best In Show: GCH Sporting Fields Shameless     Northeast Oklahoma KC (2)     04/13/2014     Best In Show Judge: Mrs. Anne Savory Bolus     Best In Show: CH Philmar Superman     Steel City KC (2)     04/13/2014     Best In Show Judge: Mrs. Judith Brown     Best In Show: CH Char’s Seattle Slew For Triple Crown     Austin KC (2)     04/13/2014     Best In Show Judge: Ms. Peggy Beisel-McIlwaine     Best In Show: CH Hitimes What The Inferno     Diana Wilson and Guy Fisher Hired as AKC Executive Field Represenatives Lundehund Intestinal Syndrome Monday Morning Coffee Talk Crufts Hound Group Winner Dies Stem Cell Therapy for Pets in Summit County Colorado Proves to Be a Success for Local Dog Suffering from Pain

We'll email you the stories that fanciers want to read from all around the web daily

We don't share your email address

New Jersey Tries Again to Regulate Small-Scale Breeders

Since 2006 various legislators in New Jersey have tried to enact a law to regulate breeders who sell more than five puppies per year or have more than two breeding dogs.

The latest is out of the Assembly, sponsored by Assemblyman Timothy J. Eustace (D) of Paramus, N.J.

A736 was introduced on Jan. 10, 2012, and referred to the Assembly Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, as were previous similar bills.

The bill’s stated purpose is to regulate what it calls “puppy mills” within the state and prevent dealers outside New Jersey from transporting massive numbers of puppies, raised in unknown and possibly abusive and unhealthy environments, into the state for sale in pet shops.

“It is definitely one of the worst kinds of bills that we’ve seen as far as restrictions,” said Lisa Peterson, director of communications for the American Kennel Club.

One of its provisions – that a bitch could only have one litter per year – has been cropping up more and more in proposed legislation, she said.

Although the bill is identical to one introduced in 2010, “It goes far beyond what the previous ones [to that] have proposed,” she added. “It’s certainly something that we’re going to be following very closely and very carefully.”

Under A736, anyone selling or offering to sell more than five dogs per year would be considered a breeder, subject to all the law’s conditions. “Any building or other structure, or area whether indoor or outdoor,” where more than two dogs are housed for the purpose of selling their puppies “for any purpose” would be a “breeding facility.”

The proposed law defines similar environmental requirements that other states have tried to impose, such as air circulation, temperature, enclosure size and materials, cleanliness, etc. In addition, it defines veterinary care and exercise standards.

It also offers a commission of at least $250 to anyone reporting a breeder suspected of operating outside the parameters of the law if it turns out to be true.

“This to me just cries out to be a witch hunt,” Peterson said. “Something like that really opens up the door to allowing unqualified individuals to put responsible people at risk.”

Another concern with the bill, Peterson said, is that it “lumps all breeders into one sub-standard category.”

When a similar bill was introduced in 2008, the New Brunswick [N.J.] Kennel club issued a statement saying, “The details of A1591 make it obvious that it intends to stop the breeding of dogs and cats in New Jersey. This bill is not pro-animal, not even pro-consumer; it is simply anti-breeder.”

The law would also apply to cat breeders.

Assemblyman Eustace’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

To read the bill, click here.

Written by

Susan Chaney has been on the editorial side of publishing since 1990, starting her career as a newspaper features writer and editor. A lifelong lover of dogs, Susan has lived with German Shepherds, Labs, Yorkies, an Irish Setter, a Great Dane-Bloodhound mix, a Sheltie and currently a Chihuahua mix of unknown pedigree. She was the editor of Dog Fancy magazine, content editor of DogChannel.com and group editor of Dog World, Dogs USA, Puppies USA, Natural Dog, Cat Fancy, Cats USA and Kittens USA from March 2005 to December 2009 when she left her position to work at home, part-time. Susan lives in Long Beach, Calif., with her artist husband, Tim, that Chi mix and two big cats. As an editor and writer for Best In Show Daily, she is reveling in the amalgam of three loves: writing, editing and dogs.

7 Comments to “New Jersey Tries Again to Regulate Small-Scale Breeders”

  1. Ann says:

    I sincerely hope that websites like Best in Show Daily, organized by dedicated dog people, can help those of us who are hobby breeders–who study and consider every possible eventuality before breeding even one litter, who health test all of our breeding dogs, who carefully screen every home before letting a puppy go, and who spend more money on our dogs than we’ll ever make–to get the message out that we CANNOT be painted with the same brush as horrific puppy mills. Legislation that lumps hobby breeders and puppy mills into one category is absurd, and counterproductive to providing healthy, happy pets to families who want a purebred dog so that they will have an idea of what to expect for the life of their new family member.

    • Dan says:

      Wow, That was great. It is staggering to read some of the proposed legislation. There must be a way to determine the differences from quality hobby breeders, from pet mills, whether purebred or mixed breed. I have seen so many dedicated breeder’s work and strive for perfection and stunned by the pet mills or pitbulls, and mixed breeds as it pops up frequently.

      Maybe acquired or breeding champions or titled dogs could be a start for establishing those who want and strive for success as opposed to those who do not even own a pooper scooper.

      Thanks for sharing

      Dan

  2. elvbend Amy says:

    I just stumbled across this page and I am impressed. Thank you for publishing the information about NJ bill A736. Every dog breeder in the country should be aware that this type of legislation is being pushed, in some form, in virtually every state of the country.

  3. Dan Sayers Dan Sayers says:

    Welcome, Amy! We’re glad you “stumbled” our way and encourage you to subscribe to our newsletter. We’ll be keeping our readers informed of similar bills being proposed throughout the country.

  4. Jenna says:

    I understand that you carefully breed your dogs. These laws are trying to stop the mistreatment of dogs in puppy mills. How else do you stop puppy mills without legislation?

  5. Mr.D says:

    $250 to rat out breeders?
    Oh brother.
    Nobody likes snitches, especially when they are being hired by taxpayer dollar.

  6. Kittens For Sale NJ says:

    Thanks for posting this info. I just want to let you know that I just check out your site and I find it very interesting and informative. I can’t wait to read lots of your post.

Leave a Reply