web analytics
Login
Subscribe
Breaking News         Nita Nee KC (2)     07/20/2014     Best In Show Judge: Mr. Stephen Hubbell     Best In Show: GCH StargazeR N Wingfield Wait Wait Don’t Tell [Dog]     Berrien KC     07/20/2014     Best In Show Judge: Mrs. Delores Burkholder     Best In Show: GCH Litilanns Show Time [Dog]     Hilton Head Island KC (2)     07/20/2014     Best In Show Judge: Mr. Norman Kenney     Best In Show: GCH Hill Countrys Tag IM It [Dog]     Paper Cities KC (2)     07/20/2014     Best In Show Judge: Dr. Anthony DiNardo     Best In Show: GCH Sonnus Filho (Sanchez) [Dog]     Galveston County KC     07/20/2014     Best In Show Judge: Mr. Arley Hussin     Best In Show: GCH Bugaboos Picture Perfect [Dog]     Tragedy Australian Shepherd Poisoned At Show & Dogs Lost in Hot Cars Rottweiler Breeder Returning from European Kennel Tour Killed in MH17 Helsinki World Dog Show Entries By Breed CKC Proposed Breed Standard Amendments For Airedale and Leonberger Take The Lead Celebrates 20 Years

We'll email you the stories that fanciers want to read from all around the web daily

We don't share your email address

Purina Sues Blue Buffalo For False Advertising and Disparagement

Independent testing shows Blue Buffalo is not being honest about its ingredients.

ST. LOUIS, MO (May 6, 2014) – Nestlé Purina PetCare Company (Purina) today announced that it has filed a lawsuit in federal court in St. Louis against The Blue Buffalo Company Ltd., for false advertising, disparagement and unjust enrichment – including violations of the Federal Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §1125(a)).

A copy of the complaint and exhibits can be found at a website Purina has created to highlight its concerns: www.petfoodhonesty.com.

“This is not an action we take lightly,” said Steven Crimmins, Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Nestlé Purina. “We believe consumers deserve honesty when it comes to the ingredients in the food they choose to feed their pets.”

“Our commitment to owners and their pets is not a marketing ploy or advertising slogan,” Crimmins added. “At Purina, what goes in the bag goes on the label.”
Blue Buffalo’s promotion, advertising and packaging repeatedly and unequivocally state that its pet food products contain “NO Chicken/Poultry By-Product Meals.” In its complaint, Purina alleges that testing conducted by an independent laboratory revealed that several of Blue Buffalo’s top-selling “Life Protection” pet food products contained significant percentages of poultry by-product meal. Testing was done from samples of multiple formulas of Blue Buffalo pet food purchased at retail stores on both the East and West Coasts. Further details on the testing can be found in the complaint.

Further details on the testing can be found in the complaint.

The complaint also alleges that testing shows Blue Buffalo “LifeSource Bits” contain poultry by-product meal and corn. In addition, several Blue Buffalo products promoted as “grain-free” actually contain rice hulls, despite Blue Buffalo stating on its website that its “grain-free” products will “free your pet from the grains and glutens that cause allergic reactions in some dogs.”

The complaint estimates that Blue Buffalo spent approximately $50 million in 2013 to promote its claims that Blue Buffalo ingredients are superior to competitors. As a result, Blue Buffalo charges premium prices for its products – significantly more than the pet food products they use for comparison purposes on the Blue Buffalo website.

The lawsuit follows a March 2014 decision of the National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, which found that Blue Buffalo is engaging in misleading advertising practices with respect to its claims about competing products. The NAD decision recommended that Blue Buffalo correct its television ad campaigns by removing all of its allegations that Blue Buffalo’s competitors are misleading consumers.

A copy of the NAD decision was attached as an exhibit to the Purina complaint.

Purina has been a leading provider of pet food and pet care products for more than 85 years, and Purina pet food is quality- and safety-checked multiple times before it is sold. Purina also maintains strict quality control over its manufacturing process – 99 percent of Purina pet food sold in the United States is manufactured at Purina plants in the United States. By contrast, 100 percent of Blue Buffalo pet food is outsourced to third-party manufacturers.

Purina’s lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in St. Louis. The case is Nestlé Purina PetCare Company v. Blue Buffalo Company Ltd., Civil Case No. 4:14-cv-00859.

Written by